Verona Pharma (NASDAQ:) has announced its first quarter 2024 financial results, highlighting the company’s progress in preparing for the potential commercial launch of its chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment, MC central. With a strong financial position, including over $250 million in cash, Verona Pharma is set to potentially introduce MC central to the US market in the third quarter of 2024, aiming to address a significant unmet medical need.
The company reported a net loss of $25.8 million for the quarter, attributing the increase in expenses to marketing, commercial preparations, and expansion of its workforce. Despite the losses, Verona Pharma is optimistic about its future, backed by a strategic financing agreement and a focus on executing its commercial strategy, including direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising. The PDUFA date for MC central is set for June 26.
Key Takeaways
- Verona Pharma is gearing up for the potential US launch of its COPD treatment, MC central, in Q3 2024.
- The company has secured a strong financial position, with over $250 million in cash and a $650 million strategic financing arrangement.
- Verona Pharma reported a Q1 2024 net loss of $25.8 million, with increased expenses due to commercial preparations and workforce expansion.
- The company’s product is expected to compete effectively in the COPD market, with a broader application than competitors’ products.
- Verona Pharma is focusing on disease awareness and physician-patient dialogue through its Unspoken COPD campaign.
- The PDUFA date for MC central is June 26, with the company entering a quiet period until then.
Company Outlook
- Verona Pharma is finalizing its commercial launch plans for MC central, targeting a Q3 2024 release.
- The company expects to achieve profitability with annual sales between $250 million and $300 million.
- A strategic financing deal has been announced to provide additional cash at launch and lower debt with fixed repayment terms.
Bearish Highlights
- The company’s net loss after tax for Q1 2024 was $25.8 million, with an increase in expenses related to marketing, commercial preparation, and workforce growth.
Bullish Highlights
- Verona Pharma has a strong balance sheet, which is expected to support the commercialization of MC central.
- The company is confident in the data supporting the approval of ensifentrine and its potential to change the COPD treatment paradigm.
Misses
- There were no specific misses reported in the earnings call.
Q&A Highlights
- Christopher Martin emphasized the importance of disease awareness and meaningful dialogue for COPD patients.
- Mark Hahn explained the RIPSA debt repayment mechanism, noting a hard cap on repayments until investors receive a 1.75x return.
- The company plans to engage in DTC advertising after ensuring physicians understand the product, with TV ads, internet banners, and social media as part of their launch plans.
Verona Pharma (VRNA) remains focused on its goal to introduce MC central to the COPD market, with a strong emphasis on creating awareness and preparing for a robust commercial launch. The company’s strategic financial planning and confidence in its clinical data suggest a positive outlook for the upcoming PDUFA date and beyond.
InvestingPro Insights
Verona Pharma’s financial results for Q1 2024 reflect a company gearing up for a significant market entry with its COPD treatment, MC central. With a market capitalization of $1.21 billion and a strong cash position, Verona Pharma holds a strategic advantage as it prepares for commercialization. However, the company’s financial metrics indicate challenges ahead, with a negative P/E ratio of -21.83, suggesting investors are currently valuing the company’s growth prospects rather than current earnings.
InvestingPro Tips indicate that analysts are optimistic about Verona Pharma’s earnings potential, with three analysts revising their earnings upwards for the upcoming period. This aligns with the company’s own expectations of profitability, driven by annual sales between $250 million and $300 million as stated in the article. Additionally, the company’s liquid assets are reported to exceed short-term obligations, providing financial flexibility in the near term.
InvestingPro Data further reveals that Verona Pharma does not pay dividends, which is common for companies focused on growth and reinvestment. The company’s net income is expected to drop this year, and analysts do not anticipate profitability within this period. This is reflected in the negative return on assets of -19.16%, indicating that the company is not generating profit from its assets as efficiently as it could.
For readers interested in a deeper analysis and more InvestingPro Tips, Verona Pharma has a total of 9 tips available on InvestingPro, which can be accessed at To help investors make more informed decisions, use coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription.
Full transcript – Verona Pharma ADR (VRNA) Q1 2024:
Operator: Hello, and welcome to Verona Pharma’s First Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Operating Highlights Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Earlier this morning, Verona Pharma issued a press release announcing its financial results for the 3 months ended March 31, 2024. A copy can be found in the Investor Relations tab on the corporate website, www.veronapharma.com. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that during today’s call, statements about the company’s future expectations, plans and prospects are forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are based on management’s current expectations. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from our expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this conference call. While the company may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, it disclaims any obligation to do so even if subsequent events cause its views to change. As a reminder, this call is being recorded and will remain available for 90 days. I’d now like to turn the call over to Dr. David Zaccardelli, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead.
David Zaccardelli: Thank you, and welcome to everyone to today’s call. With me today are Mark Hahn, our Chief Financial Officer; Dr. Kathy Rickard, our Chief Medical Officer; Chris Martin, our Chief Commercial Officer; and Dr. Tara Rheault, our Chief Development Officer. In the first quarter, we continued to make excellent progress on preparations with the planned commercialization [indiscernible] for the maintenance treatment of COPD. As you know, the FDA assigned [indiscernible] target action date for MC central of June 26. And has indicated they are not planning to hold an advisory committee meeting. We are finalizing our activities for our potential U.S launch of MC central in the third quarter of this year, and look forward to continuing our work with FDA during the review. It’s approved MC central is expected to be the first novel inhaled mechanism available for the maintenance treatment of COPD in over 20 years. We believe its dual mechanism providing bronchodilator and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory effects has the potential to change the treatment paradigm for COPD. Currently, more than 390 million patients suffer from COPD worldwide, and it is the third leading cause of death globally. Despite the availability of existing COPD treatments in the U.S., approximately 50% of the 8.6 million maintenance-treated patients experienced persistent symptoms for more than 24 days per month. In addition, approximately 60% of patients who could be considered maximally treated on dual bronchodilators or triple therapy are dissatisfied with their treatment. This highlights health care providers’ continued need for new and effective COPD therapies to provide relief to patients. We continue to make excellent progress on our commercial launch preparation and are now finalizing key aspects, including sales force deployment strategy, pricing, distribution, patient services programs, health care professional and patient engagement plan and strengthening our internal data infrastructure capabilities to enable quick and actionable insights during launch. We have also advanced our disease awareness campaign, unspoken COPD. This campaign is actively highlighting the severe impact of COPD on patients’ lives and encourages HCPs to engage patients in better dialogue to help optimize their care. Through the first quarter of this year, Unspoken COPD reached 85% of targeted HCPs, and over 2,000 HCPs engaged with the campaign website. In summary, we are in a strong position to successfully launch ensifentrine, pending approval in June. Our confidence is based on the novel profile of ensifentrine, the significant unmet need in COPD, our extensive commercial preparations and the deep experience and capabilities of the Verona team. As announced last week, we will present pooled analyses from the ENHANCE Phase III studies in 8 posters, including 2 oral symposia, at the ATS conference later this month. The posters will highlight additional pooled analyses of the Phase III ENHANCE studies, with ensifentrine for the treatment of COPD demonstrating improvements in lung function, symptoms and quality of life measures. A pooled analysis demonstrating reductions in the rate and risk of exacerbations with ensifentrine will be presented as part of the late-breaking mini symposium designed to highlight new breakthroughs. We’ll also host an exhibition booth exploring the role of phosphodiesterase in inflammation and lung function impairment in COPD, as well as 3 innovation hub presentations led by clinical experts. In addition to the planned U.S. launch of ensifentrine, we are working to initiate 2 Phase II programs with ensifentrine in the second half of this year. First, we are developing a fixed-dose combination formulation with ensifentrine and glycopyrrolate, Kalama, for the maintenance treatment of COPD delivered via a nebulizer. Upon confirmation of an adequate fixed-dose combination formulation, we plan to submit an IND to the FDA in the second half of 2024 and initiate a Phase II clinical study intending to support dose escalation for Phase III. Additionally, based on the clinical profile of ensifentrine observed in COPD patients, including a reduction in exacerbation rate and risk and improvement in symptoms of cough and sputum, we believe ensifentrine can potentially be an effective treatment for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. This is a severe chronic condition that affects up to 500,000 patients in the U.S., and there is currently no approved therapy. We plan to start a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of nebulized ensifentrine in patients with non-CF bronchiectasis in the second half of 2024. Moving on to our finances. I’m pleased to report on our strong balance sheet. In addition to over $250 million of cash on hand at the end of March, we recently strengthened our balance sheet and enhanced our financial flexibility through a $650 million strategic financing arrangement with Oaktree Capital and OMERS. We refinanced our $400 million debt facility to one with a lower overall cost of capital and more favorable financial covenants. In addition, we entered into a $250 million capped revenue interest sales transaction with repayment based on a percentage of future ensifentrine revenues. With draws available under this facility at approval, we expect to have approximately $400 million at launch and potential access to an additional $425 million, giving us a runway beyond 2026. Lastly, and before I turn the call over to Mark to review our financial results for the first quarter of 2024, I’d like to mention we’ll be entering a fit period leading into the June 26 PDUFA date, and so we welcome your questions in the Q&A session. With that, Mark, please go ahead.
Mark Hahn: Thank you, Dave. We ended the first quarter of 2024 with $254.9 million in cash and equivalents. We believe that our balance sheet remains strong. And with the current cash currently on hand and funding anticipated to be available under the $650 million strategic financing with Oaktree and OMERS, we expect to have sufficient runway beyond 2026, including the planned commercial launch of ensifentrine in the U.S. and our 2 new Phase II programs Dave discussed a few moments ago. Let me spend a minute discussing key terms of the financing package. Our primary goal in establishing this new package will be to provide additional financial flexibility to the company as we look to launch ensifentrine, increase the quantum of cash on hand at launch while decreasing covenant risk and without diluting our shareholders and providing a lower cost of capital. The financing consists of a refinance of the existing $400 million facility we have in place with Oxford and Hercules and provides for a $250 million CAP revenue interest sale, which we refer to as the RIPSA. Under the terms of the debt facility, we are drawing $55 million at close in order to repay and retire the Oxford/Hercules loan facility. We will be eligible to draw an additional $70 million of approval, with $175 million available in 2 separate milestone-based tranches and $100 million in future availability to support strategic initiatives. Draws under the facility bear interest at 11% per annum, with interest-only payments for 5 years and 100% of the principal due thereafter. Additionally, the covenant structure has been simplified and eased compared with the existing facility. Under the RIPSA, we will receive $100 million of nonapproval, with an additional $150 million available to draw at our discretion upon achieving certain commercial milestones. The revenue interest financing rate ranges from 5% of proceeds we received from ex-U.S. licensees that we may engage during the term of the RIPSA outside of the U.S. to 6.5% of global net sales of ensifentrine made by the company. The total revenue interest financing payable by the company to Oaktree and OMERS is capped at 1.75 times the amount funded, with the ability to redeem the RIPSA at much lower multiples within the first 3 years from funding. This facility was designed with an expectation that if drawn in full, it would be retired in approximately 6 years. Now back to the results. For the quarter ended March 31, 2024, net loss after tax was $25.8 million compared to a net loss after tax of $16.7 million for the same period in 2023. This represents a loss of $0.04 per ordinary share or $0.32 per ADS for the quarter compared to a loss of $0.03 per ordinary share or $0.22 per ADS for the first quarter of 2023. Research and development costs were $6.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2024 compared to the $12.6 million reported for the first quarter of 2023. This decrease was primarily due to expenses of $7.2 million in the first quarter of 2023 for finalizing all matters related to the Phase III ENHANCE program. As the program was completed in 2023, no similar costs were incurred in 2024. This decrease was partially offset by $1.5 million of pre-approval API manufacturing-related costs, as well as an increase of $0.7 million in people-related costs, including share-based compensation. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $20.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, compared to $9.6 million reported for the same period in 2023. This increase was driven primarily by increases of $4.6 million related to marketing, commercial preparation and other pre-commercial activities, $1.1 million related to professional fees, consulting costs and other administrative expenses which support our continued growth and evolution of the business and $0.7 million related to the continued build-out of our information technology infrastructure. Additionally, people-related costs increased by $4.1 million, including share-based compensation, as we increased our headcount in our commercial and support functions ahead of the planned commercial launch. I’ll now turn the call back to the operator for the Q&A.
Operator: Thank you very much. [Operator Instructions] Today’s first question comes from Andrew Tsai with Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Andrew Tsai: A couple of questions on our side. So the first 1 is on review. Regeneron (NASDAQ:), they have a PDUFA after yours, recently said the FDA notified — Regeneron’s PDUFA could be extended because the FDA wanted more information. I know you’re in discussions with the FDA routinely, maybe they ask you questions a lot. But just wanted to confirm, the FDA has not given any inclination and cease PDUFA could be extended as well?
David Zaccardelli: Thanks for the question. I would just say that we are continuing to work towards the June 26 PDUFA. And so that’s what we know and what we’re doing.
Andrew Tsai: Okay. And the estimates for Dupixent is very high of the sell-side estimates. So the question is if GP does get approved around the same time as you do, do you think physicians will be writing more scripts for ensifentrine or Dupixent on a volume basis immediately upon launch? And why do you think that’s the case?
David Zaccardelli: Thanks. I’ll give my general thoughts, and then Chris can weigh in as well. I think that, as everybody knows, Dupixent data supports its use in a subset of patients, those with higher eosinophil count, which I think has been estimated in the U.S. to involve around 300,000 patients that are currently treated. That’s of the 8.6 million that are under maintenance treatment in the U.S. So it does look like it’s targeted at a fairly small portion of the overall patient population. And of course, ensifentrine, we view it as used much broader as it was studied. And it actually — studied in patients that were on LAMA or LABA and around 20% on LABA ICS. And that makes up the bulk of the majority of the patients that are treated in the U.S. So we see its application quite wide. And so we expect utilization across that spectrum of patients. I don’t know, Chris, you want to add anything to that?
Christopher Martin: Yes. I think the only thing I would add, Dave, is as we look at our market research, which, again, Andrew, is over 1,000 physicians today is, as Dave described, they see ensifentrine’s utility across the spectrum in patients that have persistent symptoms. One thing that is a very important feature of ensifentrine is because it has both PDE3 and PDE4 activity, you get both bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory effects. That bronchodilation effect is extremely important for both physicians and patients because these patients, the number one symptom they complain about is dyspnea. So the ability to help these patients breathe better has a much broader application across this patient set that — and physician set than we believe Dupixent does. As Dave stated, ensifentrine has broad utility across the 8.6 million patients that exist and are treated with maintenance therapies today. And remember, at least half of those patients are still symptomatic. So we believe that ensifentrine, based on our market research, fits in very nicely to the treatment algorithm for the physicians at that point.
Andrew Tsai: Okay. Got it. And last really quick question is, how much do you think it will take for the launch to break even?
David Zaccardelli: Mark, do you want to comment?
Mark Hahn: Yes. Yes. Andrew, I think we’ve addressed this on previous calls. And I think it’s not just ensifentrine. I think it’s any company like Verona that has a single asset, no discovery engine, no lab space, a relatively lean overhead structure. I think in that situation, sales in the range of $250 million to $300 million run rate is what it takes to get to breakeven and profitability.
Operator: The next question comes from Yasmeen Rahimi with Piper Sandler. Yasmeen, your line is open. Please go ahead.
Yasmeen Rahimi: Sorry about that, I was on mute. Team, I guess, the first question I have is you’re going to enter a quiet period at the end of today, and it appears, I mean between now and June 26, we have like 2 more months left. So why enter quiet period so early? What was the rationale for kind of stopping the communication here? That’s one. Is that because you’re going to have more interactions with the agency and you don’t want to give us a play-by-play? Like, what’s the rationale? That’s one. Second one is with the strategic financing, also makes me think it’s a great deal, but what were the optionality of doing this now versus equity raise in a later point of time? Do you think that this financing will give you sufficient capital till full successful launch? So just again, timing of this deal and maybe more on why versus maybe other optionality’s? And then the third one is, is there any new data point or key things that we’re going to learn from ATS, strong lineup of presentations that are going to be key. I appreciate taking my 3 questions. Sorry, I’ll move back into the queue.
David Zaccardelli: Thanks very much for the questions. So maybe I’ll just touch on the quiet period, and I’ll turn it over to Mark for the strategic financing and then Tara can talk about the data at ATS. I think that with this call, we have been reviewing exactly where we are on our commercial launch plans and where we are on our development programs. Of course, just announcing the financing as well. As you point out, the last couple of months can be quite active with the FDA as well. And so I think we’ve covered everything and hopefully are up to speed on where we are. And so I think that overall, it’s a time where we’re going to be focused on our execution and really have no substantial updates until really, PDUFA. So that’s our perspective on the quiet period. I don’t know, Mark, you want to talk about the strategic financing timing?
Mark Hahn: Sure. Sure. So I think I’ve spoken in the past, as people have asked me about our financing strategy and what we’d like to do. And part of it is that we want to make sure that we always have sufficient capital. We never get into a situation where there’s a financing overhang. There’s been talk amongst investors over the past couple of quarters. Do you have enough cash on hand? Those types of questions. And so we wanted to address that situation, make sure that there is no financing overhang, at least as far as we were concerned. And 1 of the things that we did — so we exploratorily — I don’t know if that’s a word. But on an exploratory basis, we went out and talked to royalty lenders. This financing package presented itself, and the terms are, in my opinion, quite nice. And 1 of the things that we’re doing is we will have, at launch, an additional almost $100 million of cash because of the — bringing the RIPSA in. And yet we’re lowering the amount of debt — debt with fixed repayment terms and subject to covenant structures is actually being lowered by about $25 million. And we’ve also taken those covenants and significantly made them more favorable for the company. So I think you take that whole package of rationale together, and that’s what we did and that’s why we did it now. And we — when we get to approval, we will be 100% focused on launch. We won’t be focused on raising capital and distracting the team as we’re in those early days of launch. Tara?
Tara Rheault: Thanks, Mark. So I think what’s coming at ATS that we’re quite excited about, talking more about this data is more analyses of our exacerbation data, including exacerbation reduction across all baseline eosinophil subgroup. So I think that’s important data to get out there. Progression from Gold Group B to Gold Group E and what this analysis is looking at is essentially progression of patients from an infrequent exacerbate to a frequent exaster beta and showing a strong signal for a delayed progression there with ensifentrine through our ENHANCE data. In the ATS presentations, we’re also doing a deep dive into our data lung function symptoms, quality of life and exacerbation in the subgroup already taking LAMA background medication, so the LAMA subgroup and also separately the LABA ICS sub, the disease do represent the 2 largest classes of therapies that are being used today in the United States. And then finally, we have some additional data looking at the dyspnea impact with ensifentrine, of course, showing a very large and significant improvement in dyspnea across the studies in the ENHANCE program. So please do follow our ATS presentation and have a look at that.
Operator: Next question is from Tom Shrader with BTIG. Please go ahead.
Tom Shrader: Back to the deal a little bit, are you required to take anything other than the 55 to refinance the other deal? And should we assume that you’re going to take, I think it’s 100 plus 70 at approval? Would you say the odds are very high? You’d take all of that at approval? And then I have a disease question.
Mark Hahn: Yes. So actually, nothing is really required. I think the expectation should be that we would take the 100 RIPSA at approval and the $70 million under the debt deal at approval. All the other milestones and potential drugs are completely at our discretion.
Tom Shrader: Great. And then a question for Chris. The big focus on disease awareness, is that exacerbation focused? Where do you think patients are, given there’s really no good drug for exacerbations now on understanding that they might be able to treat these things early? Is that kind of the focus from your ATS headline? It seems like it might be, but is that really what you’re focused on with the disease awareness?
Christopher Martin: Tom, thank you for the question. I think when we think about the insights that we’ve learned from patients and physicians is over the course of the last year, it’s really about persistent symptoms with these patients. And one of the things that we see in the data and the literature is that patients report that they are persistently symptomatic for up to, as Dave described earlier, at least 24 days a month, you have 60% of patients on maximal treatment that are dissatisfied with their current therapies. And the point of the Unspoken COPD campaign is to really highlight how persistent these symptoms exist in these patients and how they’re existing and get the physician to engage in a more meaningful dialogue with the patient to understand if there needs to be a treatment change and how that patient wants to progress within the treatment algorithm. The important thing here is what we’ve learned about exacerbations and symptoms is exacerbations are just a worsening of symptoms. And when we talk to patients, what they tell us is they care about the day-to-day activities. They care about being able to walk outside to the mailbox, they care about being able to play with a grandchild. These activities are things that are dealt with by the ability to breathe. And the fact that ensifentrine is a PDE3, PDE4 mechanism allows for both the long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory effects to potentially occur, but also allows the physician and the patient to experience bronchodilation through that PDE3 mechanism, which that bronchodilation should open the airways up and allow that patient to breathe better and potentially get back to some of the activities that he or she is hoping to gain.
Tom Shrader: I agree, I think that’s very useful.
Operator: The next question comes from Ram Selvaraju with H.C. Wainwright.
Ram Selvaraju: Just a couple of clarificatory points around the RIPSA. It was stated in the press release that the total repayment amount will be modified if you wind up repaying it ahead of schedule. Could you just give us some additional clarity on precisely how that mechanism works and what formula applies in such a case?
Mark Hahn: Sure. Sure, Ram. So there’s a hard cap on repayments. So they’ll get 6.5% of sales here in the U.S. and 5% of any monies we bring in from ex-U.S. partners. Until they receive a return of 1.75x their investment. Now if we pay the — if we want to repay it earlier, we can do that, and there’s a different level of repayment amount each year, so that cap becomes much lower depending on how early it is. So in the first year, the cap’s lowest, second year is a little bit higher, the third is a little bit higher. And then beyond that, into the 1.75x. I don’t think we’ve disclosed this specific — the specific caps in those earlier years. But it could be at our choice. But it could be paid at a much lower cost in the first couple of years.
Ram Selvaraju: But at least where things currently stand right now, especially given the royalty percentage, the base case scenario would probably be that you hold the debt until maturity. Is that correct?
Mark Hahn: Yes, I think that depends on how you have your sales ramp built in your model. But I think as you look at the ramp and launch of ensifentrine, you first have to make the decision as to whether you think we’ll take both draws or just one, and then how quickly the revenue will be coming in from the ensifentrine sales or repay it.
Ram Selvaraju: Also related to the facility, this kind of echoes questions that were asked earlier. But were there any specific factors as you look at the overall market and the need for the launch that led you to put this in place now? Just wanted to see if there was any new information that indicated to you that commercial activities would need to be more intensive in any way or anything like that.
Mark Hahn: Yes. Great. Great question. So we’ve said over the last couple of years that when we designed the financing strategy for Verona, we did that based on understanding the full operating model and the expectations of the cost of launch, the field deployment, the amount of marketing support that it would take. And we felt even before this financing that we are very adequately capitalized in order to — to execute on that. This financing, I think you should look at it is really providing additional financial flexibility for us in terms of if we — we’re early in the launch, and we say, we could accelerate sales by stepping on the gas in this area, that provides us a little bit more capital to do that. Or if other assets present themselves that we’re interested in pursuing to broaden the portfolio, it provides us flexibility to do that as well.
Ram Selvaraju: And then just lastly, following on from that. I wanted to know whether there’s anything we should read into this with respect to how you folks are thinking about the DTC advertising element of the commercialization equation? And if we should be thinking about this as being potentially indicative of your examination of the scenario in which you would elect to bring in DTC advertising earlier rather than later? Or that really — 1 doesn’t have anything to do with the other. And if you could comment at all on what you expect the triggers to be for you are deciding to begin DTC advertising? And at what stage of the ensifentrine launch we might see that?
Mark Hahn: Okay. So maybe I’ll start on that from a financial perspective, and then Chris can talk about the DTC components. And I’d say with respect to the financing element of the question, this financing had really nothing to do with any known plans or ideas about any additional DTC other than what’s on the plan. But maybe, Chris, you can talk about how you’re thinking about DTC?
Christopher Martin: Yes, Ram, I appreciate the question. When we — over the last year, I think we’ve talked to thousands of patients now either through looking at charts or through quantitative research. And what we continue to see is just like we see with the physicians, this tremendous unmet need for something novel and new that can help the patient potentially breathe better and prevent some of the long-term effects of inflammation within the patient as well. As we think about going into launch, we have always planned to be able to reach the patient in various channels. I consider DTC, as you described, potentially as TV ads on your local cable or satellite TV networks, but reaching the patient exists in a lot of other ways today. We plan be able to reach the patient today in a more direct-to-patient manner, which is, if you think about that, it’s banner advertisements on the right Internet places, it’s reaching patients potentially through social channels. And that is something that we’ve always planned to do over the course of the last 18 months. And I think what we continue to see over the course of our research is the tremendous interest that exists with ensifentrine. The interest with HCPs is very high, but the interest with patients is also very high. So our launch plans have always included — included engaging the patient in some form or fashion over the course of the next 12 to 18 months. I think the important thing is we think about how and when you engage patients is you have to think about making sure that our physicians understand what the molecule is, how the molecule works and then how to get the molecule for their patients. Because if we do have patients going in asking for ensifentrine, we need that doctor to be able to actually prescribe it. And so that’s something that when it comes to a timing standpoint, we have to make sure that the physicians have the right awareness before we fully engage all patient activation across the launch.
Operator: Thank you. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to David Zaccardelli for closing remarks.
David Zaccardelli: Thank you, everyone, for joining us today and for your questions. I think in conclusion, we are very confident that our data support approval of ensifentrine for the maintenance treatment of COPD. And as you’ve heard today, we’re very well positioned for a successful launch. We look forward to the upcoming PDUFA date of June 26 and updating you as we proceed. So have a great day.
Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.
Read the full article here
